I'm not very familiar with the Chinese martial arts. What does Qin Na look like in practice in the modern US school? My very minimal exposure to it is confined to standing lock flow drills. In practice, does Qin Na include clinch work, take downs, throws, positional control on the ground (like you'd see in wrestling, BJJ, Judo, Sambo, et al) in addition to the distal joint locking techniques? I'm assume it must. How do most CMA practitioners approach the grappling training and how much emphasis does it receive?
So... Martial Arts are not a good place to spend training time and dollars?
In my fairly limited experience, BJJ at most places does not necessarily address the wide array of topics and techniques needed to defend yourself in an enequal initiate event. Especially if there are weapons involved. Or if it does, it will be intermixed with a lot of sporterized techniques that work best in the context of sport-specific rules.
What it does really, really well is teach positional awareness, positional control, finely tuned understanding of your opponent's weight/balance/positional mistakes in a grappling context, allowing the experienced practitioner to advance position and overtake the inexperienced opponent in a way that almost feels like effortless magic when you're on the receiving end.
They are physically different.
I don't know enough about the history to have an intelligent discussion about whether BJJ and Judo were passed down from CMA initially.
In a hands-on environment, the percentage of women physically able to stand and throw or be dominant on the ground it's not a huge one. As such, I think an emphasis on force equalizers and disengagement skills is often helpful.I appreciate those differences when I can. From a training standpoint, how do you approach training women differently from men, assuming they are training for similar problems?
I had vowed to not say it. But I am going to anyway. I think martial arts training for most women is a waste of time. Physical strength and mass differences are not going to be over come. I think a ton of martial arts hands on fighting styles for women is a mistake and give false confidence just like modern day hollywood movie fight scenes.I appreciate those differences when I can. From a training standpoint, how do you approach training women differently from men, assuming they are training for similar problems?
Being good with the obvious is what separate us from the herd.I've noticed this as well.
Give Tim White's school a look, it might be along the lines you are looking for.I think that guys are more likely to get into fights/attacks, vs women are likely to face a physical attack with ulterior motives... ??
This has been a great thread--I've love to find a program in my area that focuses on fighting/self defense, and not ranks and profit.
I know you didn't ask me...
But it all depends on what one's goals/intentions are for said martial arts.
I appreciate those differences when I can. From a training standpoint, how do you approach training women differently from men, assuming they are training for similar problems?
Very very few, they may get an initial surprise defensive attack and then they need to be gone. Staying to fight is a losing proposition. It's why I teach my daughter to attack with violence then RUN! Get away so she can live...and maybe turn around and shoot the SOB.
I had vowed to not say it. But I am going to anyway. I think martial arts training for most women is a waste of time. Physical strength and mass differences are not going to be over come. I think a ton of martial arts hands on fighting styles for women is a mistake and give false confidence just like modern day hollywood movie fight scenes.
The average man is going to beat exceptional women in hand to hand.
What percentage of men who would have the disposition to attack women can be defeated by a well trained women in martial arts?